
1. it only deals with paradigms of monogamy and fidelity. in the same way that stupid academic discussions critique heteronormativity on grounds of monogamy (as if thats the only thing wrong with it??). Which in any case is ridiculous because monogamy doesn't exist amongst heterosexual couples.... if at all, it exists in lesbian relationships :-D
2. it gives one the illusion that you fall out of love and in love oh so easily by looking. I see .. Natalie Portman with red hair - press button - enter state of love. I see idiotic man asking me ridiculous question about inane sexual encounter while I was not obligated to him, for the thousandth fucking time (BTDT, BTDT i.e. been there, done that) ... press button.. fall out of love
Yeah, right.. if it was that easy?
3. good music, repetitive music, music that holds you.. music that can then start irritating you to the point that you want to break anything
4. hmmmffff... it fucks iwth london. don't fuck with london. i like london. fuck with new york. i haven't been there.
5. there are apparently only 4 options in this world to fuck. and even amongst them there are only the obvious heterosexual counterparts... apart from not allowing even the slightest teeniest weeniest glimmer of queer readings. its like someone took a huge scissor and said - i'm going to make sure these film scholar types have nuuuuuuthing to work with. no no no queerness. snip snip snip.
6. now apart from that.. no one fucks or even flirts with anyone else but the four. where did the rest of the world go? seriously????? are they just backdrops.. cardboard characters who walk around in the gallery opening. so this is how it is.. someone's legs have opened for you and you will not take the effort of finding anyone else, because loook.. these are like the penultimate people .. we paid so much money to get these stars.. no you can't fuck anyone else
so what if we've already seen that in your idle hours you are in cyber sex chat rooms and willing to meet the worst cyber sex-er in person
7. the women never really smile.. unless its in the first stages of being coquettish and getting the guy. from there.. weeeeeee... its a downhill journey
the men don't smile at all.. if they do later on, it looks like a - you know, i rather be wanking off alone than doing this relationship crap - grimace
8. Stupid questions like -- did you go down on her? did she go down on you? Is s/he better in bed? Ofcourse he went down on her.. if you are a woman worth anything, you should have whip lashed the man into going down on a woman. It doesn't matter how jealous you are... its necessary, so shut your own trap.
if anything you should be ashamed if he sticks to those familiar patterns that some men have -- oral sex as a glorious gift only to be delivered on good behaviour, oral sex as the new penetration (i always thought finger fucking was kinda sexier, and then i made out with a woman and figured out why.. there' s something about oral sex that is actually more distant), or sex first and then oral sex.. which is okay, but its kinda nicer if i'm already there atleast somewhat..
9. sex can be compared apparently. In closer one of the women says - he's rougher than you in bed, but i prefer you. since when did fucking different people become excel sheets on matters of hardness, prettiness, skinniness... its not, its usually very different experiences.
10. contradictions, contradictions .. according to closer (yes, i do really hate it) contradictions are embodied in different people separately.. not in one person. so no one can simultaneously be in love, hate, be affectionate, patronizing towards someone.. or just have the space to be slightly schizoid.
we're all one singularity contained within the limitations of one skin ...
11 (one extra reason!). i just hate it.. is that enough?
4 comments:
"sex can be compared apparently. In closer one of the women says - he's rougher than you in bed, but i prefer you.... its not, its usually very different experiences."
-do you believe this? I would really like to agree with you, but somehow dont think it actually works like that. its so much nicer to not compare, but doesent one always end up doing that. i guess thats why point no. 10.
disappeared again? and why no response to the comment?
@anon
laugh..you're trying to rock my already jittery boat.
instead of excel sheeting the many lovers you may have, i would rather say that i have different experiences with each one. i would admit atleast to myself that i may love one most, desire the other more, seek comfort from one, and actually have fun with someone i'm just flirting with.
say, one lover gives me the multiple orgasm (the G8 summit at my G-spot), and the other is sex with hugs and kisses and conversation. and even then, i still did not feel the need to compare to make a choice. intimacy has different patterns with different people - the G8 summit with this one comes later, or not at all.
but thats how i live/feel.. probably not the way many people think :-)
Post a Comment